Feedback and support forum

Let us know any questions or queries about any of Resolution’s online products or services – such as:

Learn Resolution – learn.resolution.org.uk
Online agreements (including consent order drafting) – my.resolution.org.uk
Resolution’s main website – resolution.org.uk

Please note: any message you post on the forum is public.

Alternatively you can email us on: support@resolution.org.uk

My problem/suggestion is...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Prec 53 - include option to override the link between applicant/respondent in first and second paragraph

    There's an assumption that if it is applicant in first para transfer to the applicant - that they also have conduct of the conveyancing. This isn't always the case.

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. I work on a Mac. I've got Word, but I much prefer to use OS X Pages.

    Can Pages (.pages) be added as an export format please?

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi there Stephen -

    Thanks for your suggestion. We know we have a growing number of Mac users. We’ll monitor this as the user base grows in the coming weeks and days.

    We will add this as a possible update checking with the technical development team about what’s involved setting this up and maintaining it in future. Patrick

  5. I want to be able to search all the precedents

    It would be great to be able to search for text within precedents - to find the one you need.

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Italicization in footnotes

    When inputting footnotes.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Precedents consent orders  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Preview of the full order (before export)

    It’s clearly crucial to be able to see the individual precedents before incorporating them into the draft order, a preview of the full order showing all precedents as they are included or deleted from the order would be great.

    Some people may just use a work around by ticking all precedents export to word then simple use this as a working document deleting the precedents they don’t need.

    Could be quicker than selecting the precedents you think you may want, exporting to word, reading through and deciding to add something more, going back to the saved order adding the precedent…

    2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. The clause names "Agreement to do such and such" shouldn't export

    The clause names "Agreement to do such and such" shouldnt export - partly goes against directions from President and partly because they would need to become "smart" - ie respond to content so you didn't have "Agreement not to proceed under the Married Woman's Property Act" for a man.

    Getting rid of them for export is probably easy but need to insert some general headers into the agreement for ease of reference, eg "Introductory", "Scope" etc. The slight complexity is that these headers would not be part of a clause - they would sit before them.

    4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. When you hover over a precedent, the actual wording showed up in the blank page next to it

    it would be enormously helpful if when you hover over a precedent, the actual wording showed up in the blank page next to it!

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. 2nd batch - multiple proofing amends

    When exporting, lose headers of each clause but keep the numbering. If possible the numer will be on the same first line as the clause ie
    “32. The parties agree that….”
    If we can bring in the section headers from the left hand column into the exported doc that would be great –

    The first left hand column heading before 16 “Lump sum” – change to “Basis of lump sum order”

    5 – start bullet e with upper case The
    13 – end of para (a) change semi-colon to full stop. Samer at end of (b) and (c).
    18 –…

    3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Be able to move clause up and down

    This will need to be looked at further down the line - as new mandatory precedents are published

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Add functionality that allows you to preview each precedent (to see what it will look like once exported)

    Avoids the need to export the precedent as a Word doc multiple times

    2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Precedents consent orders  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Cross referencing - Auto numberer for linked clauses/precedents/paragraphs

    Rather than manually adding number (this would have to be done at the end of the process- once order has been exported - needs to be automated so that number is based on what paragraph it turns out to be in the order. This could be done by developing a Precedent picker.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base