Feedback and support forum

Let us know any questions or queries about any of Resolution’s online products or services – such as:

Learn Resolution – learn.resolution.org.uk
Online agreements (including consent order drafting) – my.resolution.org.uk
Resolution’s main website – resolution.org.uk

Please note: any message you post on the forum is public.

Alternatively you can email us on: support@resolution.org.uk

My problem/suggestion is...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Cohab Intro

    Add POD intro to the online version

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Cohab Agreements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. change headnote - no provision under the M(SSC)A for making financial orders

    The current precedent headnote for consent orders gives three options for the regime under which the financial order is to be made:

    MCA 1973
    CPA 2004
    M(SSC)A 2013

    The third should not be there. There is no provision under the M(SSC)A for making financial orders (unlike the CPA).
    What the M(SSC)A does is to extend the existing statutory provisions re marriage to same sex couples.
    So financial orders for divorcing same sex couples will be made under the MCA 1973.

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Reintroduce “Christmas orders”

    current draft Consent Order Precedents do not contain Child maintenance “Christmas orders” as in the previous version. Is there a reason for this?

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Problem - precedent 20 - typo

    weeks from the date of the application to the [what goes here?]

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Bullets - letters - don't renumber/letter if missing one of the bullets

    The bullets when letters within precedents don't renumber on the fly - so order might jump - e.g. a b d e, - example precedent 17

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
1 2 3 5 Next →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base