Feedback and support forum

Let us know any questions or queries about any of Resolution’s online products or services – such as:

Learn Resolution – learn.resolution.org.uk
Online agreements (including consent order drafting) – my.resolution.org.uk
Resolution’s main website – resolution.org.uk

Please note: any message you post on the forum is public.

Alternatively you can email us on: support@resolution.org.uk

My problem/suggestion is...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Cohab Agreements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. 30 - Pension – the logic is wrong

    30 - Pension – the logic is wrong in a. When you choose ‘applicant’ for instance, the logic needs to reflect singular (his or her) rather than ‘their’. It will get confusing – can we change it so you select the named party? (For example, Bill and Sue. If you choose Bill at the very start, “their best endeavours” needs to become “his best endeavours to nominate Sue” and “of which he may from time to time”. “They will nominate the other” needs to become “Bill will nominate Sue”.

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Cohab Agreements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. 17 Re business interests

    17 Re business interests – in B “clause 46” is locked in – needs to be “Insert clause” – please can you amend?

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Cohab Agreements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Naming parties

    where one party is singled out they should be named by first name. Where both are agreeing to do something they should be The Parties.

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Cohab Agreements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. HTML functionality added to WYSIWYG footnotes

    General technical tweaks to the footnotes.

    • Need more heading levels – one isn’t enough. We often go down to three, and we use a mixture of numbers, letters, roman numerals, and bullets depending on the nature of the clause. If possible, we need to be able to choose which one to use and when, as different formats get used depending on the nature of the footnote. Numbering will always be the main list level, but we need to be able to select a format for sub levels and the tab positioning.
    • Is there any way we can override…

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Cohab Agreements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Cohab Intro

    Add POD intro to the online version

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Cohab Agreements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. When exporting to word document can the recitals be set out as Paragraphs A, B etc and the clauses as 1,2,3

    When you download to word document it is very much all over the place and the clauses retain the numbers from the precedents and do not flow in nice order taking a lot of time to tidy the order up and make clear. Surely when downloading the recitals could come out A,B,C and the clauses of the order as 1,2,3,

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Mesher/Martin orders. Why cant we have a precedent for the trust terms? at least basics like triggers and so on

    The Mesher/Martin order footnotes say the trust needs to be drafted by a specialist.

    surely that is our job? things like the trigger for sale or end of trust and who pays for structural repairs etc could be in a precedent format...

    2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. I work on a Mac. I've got Word, but I much prefer to use OS X Pages.

    Can Pages (.pages) be added as an export format please?

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi there Stephen -

    Thanks for your suggestion. We know we have a growing number of Mac users. We’ll monitor this as the user base grows in the coming weeks and days.

    We will add this as a possible update checking with the technical development team about what’s involved setting this up and maintaining it in future. Patrick

  10. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. I want to be able to search all the precedents

    It would be great to be able to search for text within precedents - to find the one you need.

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Bullets - letters - don't renumber/letter if missing one of the bullets

    The bullets when letters within precedents don't renumber on the fly - so order might jump - e.g. a b d e, - example precedent 17

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Be able to move clause up and down

    This will need to be looked at further down the line - as new mandatory precedents are published

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Precedents consent orders  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base