Feedback and support forum

Let us know any questions or queries about any of Resolution’s online products or services – such as:

Learn Resolution – learn.resolution.org.uk
Online agreements (including consent order drafting) – my.resolution.org.uk
Resolution’s main website – resolution.org.uk

Please note: any message you post on the forum is public.

Alternatively you can email us on: support@resolution.org.uk

My problem/suggestion is...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Order 49

    In 49 can we lose the numbering and the three “as to”. Then each line should be “On or before [insert time] on [CALENDAR].” With insert time over-writable.

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Order 50 - para numbering

    In 50 can we lose the para numbering.

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Clause 48 change - add arbitration

    There are three changes to the clause below. 48.2 has to be a bracketed option for those who do not want to consider arbitration at all – just agreeing to mediate or go to collab. 48.1 has to contain an option to go straight to arbitration. And then 48.2 has to have “under the terms of [48.1] above” inserted to allow for the rare situation where people agree to try mediation first and then arb if that fails.

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Cohab Agreements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Cohab Agreements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Problem - precedent 20 - typo

    weeks from the date of the application to the [what goes here?]

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Search through information in online publication

    There should be a search function available

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  International Family Law publication  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. 30 - Pension – the logic is wrong

    30 - Pension – the logic is wrong in a. When you choose ‘applicant’ for instance, the logic needs to reflect singular (his or her) rather than ‘their’. It will get confusing – can we change it so you select the named party? (For example, Bill and Sue. If you choose Bill at the very start, “their best endeavours” needs to become “his best endeavours to nominate Sue” and “of which he may from time to time”. “They will nominate the other” needs to become “Bill will nominate Sue”.

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Cohab Agreements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Financial remedy order  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Cohab Agreements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Reintroduce “Christmas orders”

    current draft Consent Order Precedents do not contain Child maintenance “Christmas orders” as in the previous version. Is there a reason for this?

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Cohab Agreements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. When exporting to word document can the recitals be set out as Paragraphs A, B etc and the clauses as 1,2,3

    When you download to word document it is very much all over the place and the clauses retain the numbers from the precedents and do not flow in nice order taking a lot of time to tidy the order up and make clear. Surely when downloading the recitals could come out A,B,C and the clauses of the order as 1,2,3,

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. 17 Re business interests

    17 Re business interests – in B “clause 46” is locked in – needs to be “Insert clause” – please can you amend?

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Cohab Agreements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Naming parties

    where one party is singled out they should be named by first name. Where both are agreeing to do something they should be The Parties.

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Cohab Agreements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Bullets - letters - don't renumber/letter if missing one of the bullets

    The bullets when letters within precedents don't renumber on the fly - so order might jump - e.g. a b d e, - example precedent 17

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. HTML functionality added to WYSIWYG footnotes

    General technical tweaks to the footnotes.

    • Need more heading levels – one isn’t enough. We often go down to three, and we use a mixture of numbers, letters, roman numerals, and bullets depending on the nature of the clause. If possible, we need to be able to choose which one to use and when, as different formats get used depending on the nature of the footnote. Numbering will always be the main list level, but we need to be able to select a format for sub levels and the tab positioning.
    • Is there any way we can override…

    0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Cohab Agreements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  1 comment  ·  Cohab Agreements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base