Feedback and support forum

Let us know any questions or queries about any of Resolution’s online products or services – such as:

Learn Resolution – learn.resolution.org.uk
Online agreements (including consent order drafting) – my.resolution.org.uk
Resolution’s main website – resolution.org.uk

Please note: any message you post on the forum is public.

Alternatively you can email us on: support@resolution.org.uk

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Bullets - letters - don't renumber/letter if missing one of the bullets

    The bullets when letters within precedents don't renumber on the fly - so order might jump - e.g. a b d e, - example precedent 17

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Be able to move clause up and down

    This will need to be looked at further down the line - as new mandatory precedents are published

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Precedents consent orders  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Cross referencing - Auto numberer for linked clauses/precedents/paragraphs

    Rather than manually adding number (this would have to be done at the end of the process- once order has been exported - needs to be automated so that number is based on what paragraph it turns out to be in the order. This could be done by developing a Precedent picker.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Improve usability of home page

    more obvious how to start new agreement

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Precedent 20 - typo that needs correcting

    "...will be received by the court not less than 5 working days before the BLANK is written"

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Order 50 - para numbering

    In 50 can we lose the para numbering.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Order 49

    In 49 can we lose the numbering and the three “as to”. Then each line should be “On or before [insert time] on [CALENDAR].” With insert time over-writable.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Order 48.2

    In 48.2 can we lose that numbering and also lose the last “at the rate of £[BOX]”. Can we lose the numbering for 48.3 and change the last words from “paragraphs 1 and 2 above” to “the provisions above”

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Order 45 - free text boxes

    In 45 the free text boxes are unduly large

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Order 39 - last words

    39 – can we change last words to “any of the events in this undertaking taking place.”

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. Order 38.1

    38.1 – the 4th box (if not using the first dropdown) should have an option for “the children of the family”. The box “during her lifetime or cessation of” is picking up gender from the wrong party – if the Applicant is chosen first at the start to make the undertaking, then it should pick up gender from the Respondent. In 38.2 can we change “in accordance with the terms of annex "B" to this order” to “in accordance with the terms of the annex to this order”. In 38 and 39 can we lose the paragraph numbers.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Order 35

    At 35 we found the free text box slightly confusingly placed. We wondered if we could have just the three blue arrows then three options: “The parties agree to dispose of…” “Free text as appropriate” and “Leave blank”. At (d)ii below that, the box should read “insert name of accountants/financial planner” over-writeable.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Order 33

    In 33 the first box should have “insert name of insurance company” over-writeable

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base